Destroying Evidence is Evident.

FireFightersFor911Truth.org

When there is a known crime scene, the obvious thing that one does not do, is destroy the evidence. So why was the trade towers evidence not even tested, but destroyed before it could even be tested contrary to even basic firefighting instructional manuals?



Let us not further forget the impossibility of a 100 ton 757 hitting the pentagon contrary to all the laws of physics. Just think how an untrained pilot could have the skill to precision fly a jetliner perfectly executing a tight turn at over 500 mph and then hit the base of a building precisely without even denting the lawn in front of it nor damaging or moving the large cable spools (OOPS!) that were sitting there? Also, the total lack of debris from the plane and cargo is questionable. Also, the hole in the building is all wrong. The heaviest and most mass of the plane are the engines. If there were going to be any holes in the building, there would be two created by the engines, not one created by the low tensile strength of aluminum from the nose and fuselage of the plane. Things just don't add up here according to even the most basic expectations of what would be normal to see. When something like these two aircraft crash incidents are investigated, they are supposed to answer many questions that are unknown. Yet the investigation of these two events give rise to more questions than answers. The complete opposite of what an honest non-biased investigation is supposed to do.




 

 

(Exclusively tested at the Pentagon on September 11, 2001.)

 

 

 

(*Tire marks on lawn are temporary and will gradually disappear within an hour.)

 

On September 11, 2001, a bunch of mean nasty Arab terrorists -- who hated our freedoms -- hijacked American Airlines Flight 77, a Boeing 757 fully loaded with fuel, and crashed it through the first floor of the west side wall of the Pentagon.

 

 

 

 

Just listen to what the reports of this horrible crash had to say...

 

 

"Some eyewitnesses believe the plane actually hit the ground at the base of the Pentagon first, and then skidded into the building." - CBS
 
"...it didn't appear to crash into the building; most of the energy was dissipated in hitting the ground, but I saw the nose break up, I saw the wings fly forward, and then the conflagration engulfed everything in flames...But I think the blessing here might have been that the airplane hit before it hit the building, it hit the ground, and a lot of energy might have gone that way. That's what it appeared like." - CNN
 
"What -- or who -- caused Flight 77 to hit ground first, diffusing most of its destructive energy before it slammed into the Pentagon?" - ESPN / MSN
 
"According to one witness, 'what looked like a 747' plowed into the south side of the Pentagon, possibly skipping through a heliport before it hit the building."  - Stars and Stripes
 

 

 
The Boeing 757 struck Wedge 1 on the Heliport side of the Pentagon very low to the ground and entered Wedge 1 just to the north of Corridor 4 on the first and second floors. - Annual Status Report to Congress

l

"And the plane came through the first floor, right through Naval Ops..." - CNN

 

 

"As eyewitnesses described and photographs demonstrate, the hijacked airliner dived so low as it approached the Pentagon that it actually hit the ground first, thereby dissipating much of the energy that might otherwise have caused more extensive damage to the building." - Snopes.com
 
"The plane slammed into the west wall of the Pentagon. The impact was deafening. The fuselage hit the ground and blew up." - Delaware Online
 
"I watched in horror as the plane flew at treetop level, banked slightly to the left, drug it's wing along the ground and slammed into the west wall of the Pentagon exploding into a giant orange fireball." - James Madison Univ.
 
"Then he caught an edge of his wing on the ground. There is a helicopter pad right in front of the side of the Pentagon. The wing touched there, then the plane cart wheeled into the building." - Time
 
"It is also evident that the plane was on the ground before striking the Pentagon albeit skimming the grass. I might also point out that distant photos will miss details on the ground that up-close observation would show." - Christian Patriots/Pentagon Crash Analysis
 

Patrick Di Justo: "The plane hit the ground first, then slid into the building."  - Paul Boutin weblogger.com

 

 

 

"NBC’s Jim Miklaszewski explains that the sequence of five photos, taken from a Department of Defense security camera, shows the Boeing 757 hitting the ground an instant before it plows into the building and explodes in a deadly fireball." - MSNBC

 

 

 

 

That must have hurt!

 

 

Just think what this would do to your lawn after an explosion like this.

Plane debris, skid marks, fire burns, jet fuel, luggage, body parts, yuck!

You would have to shell out thousands of dollars to clean up this mess!

But wait, this is not your ordinary lawn!

 

 

 

 

 

 

Do you think just any lawn would hold up like this after a plane crashed on it?

 

 

 

 

 

Only the can withstand the shear punishment
from the crash of a fully fueled 100 ton commercial airliner!

 

 

 

 

This is how ordinary lawns look after commercial airliners crashed on them...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

But look how marvelous the held
up right after a fully fueled Boeing 757 crashed on it...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Even your spouse will be impressed!

 

 

 

 

And look how nice and neat the looks after the roof collapses...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wish we could say the same about the Pentagon...

 

 

 

 

Of course, with an amazing new lawn like this that is sure to take the world by storm, we had to cover it up so our secret wouldn't get out...

 

 

 

So don't just settle for any lawn. Demand the best
most resilient lawn money can buy today!
 

 

 

 

 

 

Guaranteed to resist:

Fire

Explosions

Skid marks

Planes crashing on it

Guaranteed to repel:

Plane debris

Jet fuel

Luggage

Body parts

 

 

 

 

 

 

For more questions about

 

please click here

 

 

 


 

New!

 

From the makers of the  comes the virtually indestructible...

 

 

Click here!

 

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments
  • No comments exist for this post.
Leave a comment

Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.