
Mon, May 3
Toronto, May 3 (IANS) Accusing world famous astrophysicist Stephen Hawking of spreading misinformation about threats from aliens, former Canadian defence minister Paul Hellyer claimed Sunday that extraterrestrials have actually been visiting earth for decades.
Rather than harm mankind, he said, their (aliens’) spaceships have provided us information for triggering today’s microchip and IT revolution on our planet.
Hawking has recently warned humanity against contacting aliens. ‘If aliens visit us, the outcome would be much as when Columbus landed in America, which didn’t turn out well for the Native Americans,” the British astrophysicist has said.
According to Hawking, if human beings tried to contact aliens, they could invade us and take away our most important resources. ‘If they (aliens) wanted to use our solar system, for some super project, our complaints would be like an ant colony protesting the laying of a parking lot,” Hawking has said in a new documentary.
Hawking has also said that though most extraterrestrial life could be only in the form of small animals, but there could also be ‘nomads, looking to conquer and colonize” other planets. Taking issue with Hawking Sunday, the former Canadian defence minister, who himself is an expert on the subject and has has been speaking about aliens for years, said aliens have already visited earth and contributed to our technological advancement.
Hellyer told the Canadian Press that ‘the reality is that they (aliens) have been visiting earth for decades and probably millennia and have contributed considerably to our knowledge.” He said our computer screens have their origins in alien spaceships. ‘Microchips, for example, fiber-optics, they are just two of the many things that allegedly – and probably for real – came from crashed vehicles,” the Canadian said.
Blaming Hawking for scaring mankind about aliens, he said, ‘He (Hawking) is indulging in some pretty scary talk there that I would have hoped would not come from someone with such an established stature. ‘I think it is really sad that a scientist of his repute would contribute to what I would consider more misinformation about a vast and very important subject.”
|
|
|
|
|
(Exclusively tested at the Pentagon on September 11, 2001.) |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
(*Tire marks on lawn are temporary and will gradually disappear within an hour.)
|
|
On September 11, 2001, a bunch of mean nasty Arab terrorists -- who hated our freedoms -- hijacked American Airlines Flight 77, a Boeing 757 fully loaded with fuel, and crashed it through the first floor of the west side wall of the Pentagon. |
|
|
|
|
|
Just listen to what the reports of this horrible crash had to say... |
|
|
| "Some eyewitnesses believe the plane actually hit the ground at the base of the Pentagon first, and then skidded into the building." - CBS |
| "...it didn't appear to crash into the building; most of the energy was dissipated in hitting the ground, but I saw the nose break up, I saw the wings fly forward, and then the conflagration engulfed everything in flames...But I think the blessing here might have been that the airplane hit before it hit the building, it hit the ground, and a lot of energy might have gone that way. That's what it appeared like." - CNN |
| "What -- or who -- caused Flight 77 to hit ground first, diffusing most of its destructive energy before it slammed into the Pentagon?" - ESPN / MSN |
| "According to one witness, 'what looked like a 747' plowed into the south side of the Pentagon, possibly skipping through a heliport before it hit the building." - Stars and Stripes |
|
|
| The Boeing 757 struck Wedge 1 on the Heliport side of the Pentagon very low to the ground and entered Wedge 1 just to the north of Corridor 4 on the first and second floors. - Annual Status Report to Congress |
| l |
|
"And the plane came through the first floor, right through Naval Ops..." - CNN |
|
|
| "As eyewitnesses described and photographs demonstrate, the hijacked airliner dived so low as it approached the Pentagon that it actually hit the ground first, thereby dissipating much of the energy that might otherwise have caused more extensive damage to the building." - Snopes.com |
| "The plane slammed into the west wall of the Pentagon. The impact was deafening. The fuselage hit the ground and blew up." - Delaware Online |
| "I watched in horror as the plane flew at treetop level, banked slightly to the left, drug it's wing along the ground and slammed into the west wall of the Pentagon exploding into a giant orange fireball." - James Madison Univ. |
| "Then he caught an edge of his wing on the ground. There is a helicopter pad right in front of the side of the Pentagon. The wing touched there, then the plane cart wheeled into the building." - Time |
| "It is also evident that the plane was on the ground before striking the Pentagon albeit skimming the grass. I might also point out that distant photos will miss details on the ground that up-close observation would show." - Christian Patriots/Pentagon Crash Analysis |
|
Patrick Di Justo: "The plane hit the ground first, then slid into the building." - Paul Boutin weblogger.com |
|
|
|
"NBC’s Jim Miklaszewski explains that the sequence of five photos, taken from a Department of Defense security camera, shows the Boeing 757 hitting the ground an instant before it plows into the building and explodes in a deadly fireball." - MSNBC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That must have hurt! |
|
|
|
Just think what this would do to your lawn after an explosion like this. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Do you think just any lawn would hold up like this after a plane crashed on it? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Only the
|
||
|
|
||
|
This is how ordinary lawns look after commercial airliners crashed on them... |
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
But look how marvelous the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Even your spouse will be impressed! |
|
|
|
|
|
And look how nice and neat the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Wish we could say the same about the Pentagon... |
||
|
|
||
|
|
|
Of course, with an amazing new lawn like this that is sure to take the world by storm, we had to cover it up so our secret wouldn't get out...
|
|
|
|
So don't just settle for any lawn. Demand
the best
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guaranteed to
resist:
Explosions |
Guaranteed to repel: |
|
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
For more questions about
|
|
|
|
New!
|
|
From the
makers of the
|
The
capacative energy storage device developed by the I.N. Frantsevich
Institute for Problems of Materials Science (IPMS), Kiev, Ukraine,
works on a completely
The mono-molecular sheets deposited by this technique are wrapped back and forth on top of each other, more than one million times per millimeter, and are separated from each other by a distance of less than one atomic diameter. At this level of construction, the material becomes subject to the rules of quantum mechanics which are almost entirely probabilistic. That means a whole atom of carbon (or almost anything else except an electron or photon) will not fit in the space which separates the lattice sheets.
When viewed under an electron microscope, the sheets produce a pattern which looks for all the world like an endless field of four-sided pyramids, connected base to base, on a single plane, with the tips of the pyramids protruding endlessly, uniformly upwards. When wrapped back and forth on top of each other, these sheets of pure carbon crystal, made of carbon molecules shaped like trillions of identical tiny pyramids, all arrayed endlessly in identical formation, are positioned so that the tips of the pyramids on the bottom sheet are matched with the tips of the pyramids on the top sheets. What remains between the pyramid tips are open "spaces" or energy wells.
The quantum physics which describes the characteristics of the energy wells created between the layers of crystalline lattice is largely unknown to Western physicists. The Soviet model predicts with a high degree of probability that the quanta of energy referred to in the West as electrons (and, in some cases, photons), the stuff of which electricity is made, will, when introduced to the lattice structure, search, find and fit into the energy wells with military precision.
During the recharging or loading phase, the energy storage devices made of the crystalline lattice material channel one electron at a time into each well created by four carbon pyramids on the bottom layer and four carbon pyramids on the top layer. Because the rules of quantum mechanics which operate in this tiny environment demand it, each electron or quanta of energy has a certain polarity, spin and "color" (and other mathematically defined characteristics) which must be accommodated if it is to find, fit and stay in an energy well. Interestingly enough, when a current is applied across the lattice-work structure, the electrons behave precisely as nonlinear quantum mechanics predicts they will. They flow much like a fluid into the lattice field, then separate into individual energy quanta and spin into the last energy well in each layer, automatically adjusting their individual spin, polarity and color to match their characteristics to fit the requirements of each well, until the lattice is full.
Because no chemical reactions are involved in the process of marching electrons into or out of the energy well fields, there is no resistance in the circuit. In the absence of resistance, the electrons fill the wells at light speed, never missing a space, automatically adjusting polarity, spin and other characteristics, and creating no heat. The amount of time required to "charge" such a cell is less than 5% of the time required to recharge a conventional chemical battery of similar voltage and current.
The validity of E = MC2 is called into question by the way these devices function. When the battery is fully charged, it actually demonstrates more mass than when the energy storage device is empty or discharged. The laws of quantum mechanics relied on in the West state categorically that this is not possible. It is the answer to the question, "How much does a beam of light weigh?"
According to the Soviet model, this is precisely as it should be. When this phenomenon was first demonstrated to scientists in the West who were testing the energy storage devices at INEEL in Idaho, they were thunderstruck. The quanta of energy, or electrons as we refer to them, which are poured into the crystalline lattice demonstrate characteristics of mass even though they are bundles of pure energy sitting in stasis, literally at rest. The characteristic of mass is verifiable – you can measure it by weighing the energy storage devices before and after they are charged. When they are charged, they demonstrate appreciably more mass than when they are fully discharged.
If this is confusing to you, to suggest that pure energy can be shown to demonstrate verifiable mass while at rest (in stasis), perhaps you can begin to appreciate how fundamentally different the physics of all this is when viewed in the terms of Einstein's classic equation E = MC2.
The existence of this technology clearly is proof positive that not only does energy demonstrate the characteristics of mass, but it does so in a state of non-motion or stasis, sitting idly in an energy well. A state of stasis is a very far cry from the terminal theoretical velocity required by the constant in Einstein's equation, equivalent to the square of the speed of light.
The scientific implications of this phenomenon are truly staggering. At very least, the verification of mass as a property of energy quanta at rest suggests that Einstein's theory of relativity may be altogether incorrect as a means of describing the dynamics underlying the real nature of the material world and its relationship to energy.
The existence of this technology suggests, at very least, that energy and mass are equivalent characteristics of all things which are manifest in the material world. It is this fundamental contextual difference which distinguishes the Soviet model of quantum mechanics from the Western model. "The proof of the pudding," they say, "is in the eating."
Theoretical physicists may argue endlessly about the validity of the assumptions relied on by the IPMS scientists to develop their unique sciences, technologies and materials. But they cannot argue about the existence of the materials which have arisen from that context. They are as real as they can be. And they are unlike anything ever seen or contemplated in the West.
In the same way energy quanta stored in the energy wells of crystalline lattice materials demonstrate complete mathematical satisfaction with staying there indefinitely, when allowed to flow out in the form of an outgoing wave of electrical discharge, these quanta (electrons or photons, as you prefer) march right back out without resistance at light speed through a closed circuit to another use.
When these energy storage devices are discharged, they demonstrate other attributes which are not known in Western science, and which, because of the very nature of the chemical reactions we are accustomed to, are not theoretically possible according to conventional wisdom. Conventional chemical batteries, when fully charged, produce electric current at a useable voltage for perhaps 30-40% of the total discharge cycle. After that, either the voltage or amperage (or both) drop to low enough levels that the devices being powered by them cannot recognize or use the electrical current which remains available. At that point, the batteries either have to be recharged or replaced.
The crystal lattice batteries have been demonstrated to produce precisely the same current and voltage levels throughout 98% of their discharge cycle. They produce no heat during discharge, regardless of the rate at which they are discharged. This is absolutely contrary to our experience with batteries, transformers or capacitors. Until the crystalline lattice materials were specifically engineered to register an electronically detectable blip at 95-96% discharge, it was impossible even for the scientists who developed them to distinguish a partially discharged battery from a fully charged one.
There is another characteristic which is intrinsic to energy storage devices which comes into play here. It is a characteristic of materials which is described as energy density. For non-scientific readers, this concept can simply be construed to mean the amount of measurable electrical current which can be produced by any device or material when its mass is converted into electrical energy. The concept is expressed in mathematical formulas as the number of watts and hours of consumable energy which can be converted from each kilogram of material. It is expressed as watt-hours per kilogram.
Here is an example we can all understand. Consider gasoline. When converted into electrical power at 100% efficiency, gasoline has been theoretically shown to have an energy density of between 550 and 600 watt-hours per kilogram of mass. In easy terms, that means that if one kilogram of gasoline were converted into pure electricity at 100% efficiency (with no loss due to heat, resistance, waste, etc.), the reservoir of energy would power a 100-watt light bulb for 5.5 to 6 hours.
Most of the high-end conventional automobile batteries of the lead-acid variety operate at an energy density rate of between 20-25 watt-hours per kilogram. The best NASA sodium-hydride batteries operate at 48-50 watt hours per kilogram. The energy accumulator devices which have been tested at the Idaho National Electronic Laboratories have demonstrated energy densities of between 850 and 1050 watt-hours per kilogram.
What does this mean in practical terms? It means, for one thing, that for the first time in the history of science an energy storage device has been created with an energy density which is greater than gasoline or any other refined fossil fuel. It means that devices which rely on these energy storage technologies can theoretically be designed to store and deliver clean electrical power at higher rates of efficiency than any fossil fuel ever discovered.
The global implications of this technology are irresistible. It means, among other things, that the technology exists, right now, to eliminate the need to build another nuclear power plant or dam another river to produce hydroelectric power. It means we can no longer justify burning another ounce of petroleum, another piece of coal, another cubic centimeter of natural (or unnatural gas) or another tree to produce heat, electricity or power for any purpose, including transportation.
When coupled with the plasma beam devices being tested by the Soviet infantry units in Afghanistan, these energy storage devices operated at such unbelievably high rates of discharge efficiency that they made it possible to repeatedly induce huge electrical discharges in a highly mobile configuration.
The same technologies which were used to produce the energy storage devices have been adapted to create transformers and capacitors with previously unimaginable performance characteristics. Instead of adhering to the conventional western model of "One Volt at One Amp across a resistance of One Ohm equals One Cubic Meter," the Soviets have produced a capacitor which measures more than 1200 farads at 10,000 amperes in a package the size of a tuna sandwich.
When tested by the Technology Materials Testing Laboratory of the Defense Department at the Pentagon and at the I.N.E.E.L. in Idaho, totally new testing equipment had to be designed, engineered and constructed just to test the devices. The scientists at those laboratories had never tested anything like these materials before.
Instead of having to house transformer and capacitor devices in a series of trailers towed by diesel tractors or huge fixed-base facilities, the operating apparatus which supplied transformed power and high intensity capacitive bursts to the light cannons weighed less than ten pounds and could easily be transported in a backpack by a foot soldier.
One final question remains unanswered. "How did the energy storage devices, once dissipated or discharged, become recharged in the field, especially in the dark of night?"
The back-pack plasma beam device detected by the AWAC's during limited combat use in the Afghanistan desert was powered by energy storage devices constructed of crystalline lattice materials. After each laser burst, the energy storage devices were recharged every 12-15 minutes (nearly 45 minutes in the dark of night – the residual ambient heat of the desert is a very efficient source of infrared energy) by sunlight, collected and converted to electricity by four-foot square panels of "solar cell" material arrayed on a pole like a flag, each weighing less than ten ounces.
The electrical energy stored in the back-pack energy accumulators was transformed into enormously high voltages and released at almost unbelievably high current levels when the super-capacitors were sufficiently charged. The beam of "light" detected by the AWAC's crews was a field of plasma, flowing at the speed of light and demonstrating characteristics of mass (and, therefore, kinetic energy). The phenomenon represented by these bolts of lightning are not comprehensible according to the model of quantum mechanics and plasma physics currently being used in the West.
Battery packs utilizing these energy accumulator materials have been designed, produced and tested which provide more than 14 hours of continuously transmitted power on a single charge to conventional hand-held cellular telephone devices. Similar improvements in conventional battery/energy storage capacity have been developed and are being tested for such devices as video camcorders, laptop and portable computers and other similar consumer, commercial, industrial and military applications.
IPMS research in the field of layered crystals has thus led to the creation of capacitors with a very high level of capacitance (measured in farads). This technology is based on a revolutionary production technique which forms polarized surfaces of one molecule thickness, separated by less than one atomic diameter of space, held together by weak Van der Waals energy forces. The special properties created by these layered crystalline structures provide previously unimaginable internal surface areas. Super capacitors are constructed of layered materials numbering more than one million dipole sheets for each millimeter of crystal thickness.
These devices provide a virtually limitless number of charge-discharge cycles at astonishingly rapid charge and discharge rates. The potential impact of such devices on all electronic equipment currently being produced is incalculable, since virtually all electronic devices rely extensively on the West's state-of-the-art tantalum capacitance technologies.
At present, IPMS has on hand (among others) a super-capacitor roughly the size and dimension of a sandwich which develops more than 1,200 farads at 10,000 amperes. It also boasts production of a battery whose active mass energy density exceeds 850 watt-hours per kilogram. For the non-scientist (and all the rest of us as well) this means that a "battery" has been produced which, for the first time in history, produces more power per unit of mass than any fossil fuel ever devised.
Prototype testing of larger-scaled devices designed specifically for providing power to electric vehicles is currently underway. Prototypes are expected to be capable of sustained highway speeds of up to 70 miles per hour with a range of 525 miles on a single charge. The power plant for this application has been recently improved by the inclusion of a proprietary solid-state ceramic electric motor which weighs 7.2 kilograms and produces 100 horsepower on 12-volt direct current. For comparison, an electric vehicle employing a 100-horsepower electric motor performs the same as with a 500-horsepower gasoline engine.
If these performance attainments can be sustained in broad-based applications, electrically powered vehicles could be produced which would meet or exceed virtually all performance characteristics currently available in equipment relying on internal combustion, petroleum-based engines. Gasoline/diesel-powered transportation devices can be replaced by cleaner, more efficient and significantly less expensive alternatives.
The world market for current energy storage applications which will be superceded by these energy storage technologies is estimated to be in excess of $24 billion per year (1991), exclusive of electric vehicle considerations.
Joint ventures of the IPMS with more than a dozen private sector companies to develop useful energy inventions have been repeatedly sabotaged by the U.S. Government's Defense Intelligence Agency and others. (Source: David G. Yurth, The Anthropos Files: Tales of Quantum Physics from Another World – 2nd Edition, 2007)
While there are many great people in the health care field, lately the bureaucracy is leaving me with a bit more than desired.
Click the play button to watch a scene from Idiocracy. 36 seconds.